Trustworthy content that restores credibility to the news
To provide trustworthy, clear and impartial content that restores credibility to the news and reduces the impact of misleading information.
Kashaf is an independent fact-checking and investigative journalism platform. We put circulating claims to the test and publish our evidence in full — with a public methodology and a transparent corrections policy.
To provide trustworthy, clear and impartial content that restores credibility to the news and reduces the impact of misleading information.
For Kashaf to be a trusted Arabic reference on Syrian affairs for verifying news and countering rumors, extending its coverage to related Arab issues, within a knowledge environment grounded in transparency and professionalism.
Our editorial decisions are entirely independent, and our funding is disclosed as far as possible.
We are committed to keeping editorial decisions fully independent, with no influence from supporters or funders over:
In line with transparency standards and procedural-trust criteria, we disclose on our site (as far as possible and subject to safety considerations):
The Kashaf team is committed to disclosing any potential conflict of interest related to a fact-check, and such cases are handled under internal procedures that may include reassigning the task or widening the review.
We believe financial transparency is the cornerstone of trust. Here is how we are funded.
The platform launched on self-funding from its founders, used to cover the initial technical costs: building the website, designing the visual identity, and the core subscriptions to digital verification tools.
At its launch and through its early growth, Kashaf relied on the volunteer efforts of a team of journalists and technologists who believe in the need for an accurate information environment.
We rely on community contributions and unconditional grants. All donors sign a declaration not to interfere in editorial policy, and their identities are disclosed to regulators to prevent any conflict of interest.
We declare our commitment to the following principles to protect our professional integrity and editorial independence.
No grantor, donor, or supporting party may view investigations before publication, review them, or request changes to them.
The editorial team, under the supervision of the fact-checking director, holds sole authority to choose topics and set priorities based solely on significance and reach.
Conclusions are reached on the basis of evidence, material indicators, and scientific method, free of any external pressure or dictation, whatever its source.
Members disclose any potential conflict of interest, and no member may fact-check material that could touch their personal interests or direct professional relationships.
We categorically reject any financial contribution in exchange for steering content, withholding information, or changing verification outcomes in favor of any party.
Explore our verification methodology, or meet the team behind the platform.